[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140930160331.GN2548@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:03:31 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 1/4] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Add
arm_dbg_regs_available flag
Hi Geert,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If power area D4, which contains the Coresight-ETM hardware block, is
> powered down on R-Mobile A1 (r8a7740), the kernel crashes when
> suspending from s2ram with:
>
> Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 0 [#1] ARM
>
> This happens because dbg_cpu_pm_notify() calls reset_ctrl_regs(), which
> can't access the debug registers as the debug module is powered down.
>
> As suggested by Russell King, track whether the ETM block is powered down
> to fix this.
>
> The availability of the debug registers depends on the platform and its
> state. Hence provide a mechanism for platform code to indicate that the
> debug registers are available or not, using a boolean flag that defaults
> to true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> v2:
> - New
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index 8e427c7b44257d2d..51ffdae41bfe3754 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
> asm volatile("mcr p14, 0, %0, " #N "," #M ", " #OP2 : : "r" (VAL));\
> } while (0)
>
> +extern bool arm_dbg_regs_available;
> +
> struct notifier_block;
> struct perf_event;
> struct pmu;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index b5b452f90f761bd2..96193c0165fbe5ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
> #include <asm/traps.h>
> #include <asm/hardware/coresight.h>
>
> +bool arm_dbg_regs_available = true;
> +
> /* Breakpoint currently in use for each BRP. */
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event *, bp_on_reg[ARM_MAX_BRP]);
>
> @@ -931,6 +933,11 @@ static void reset_ctrl_regs(void *unused)
> int i, raw_num_brps, err = 0, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> u32 val;
>
> + if (!arm_dbg_regs_available) {
> + pr_warn_once("Debug registers are not available\n");
> + return;
> + }
Whilst I guess this solves your problem, it doesn't feel like a scalable fix
for something that can/will assumedly happen elsewhere in an SoC (e.g. PMU
registers in perf). I'd much rather have a generic abstraction for power
domains, which subsystems such as hw_breakpoint can attempt to take a
reference on when they want to access registers in that domain.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists