lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:29:34 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, broonie@...nel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Allow read_reg_mask to be 0

On 09/30/2014 11:18 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Lars
>
> On 09/30/2014 04:03 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 09/30/2014 06:07 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> There may be spi devices that do not require a
>>> register read mask to read the registers.
>>>
>>> Currently the code sets the read mask based on
>>> a non-zero value passed in from the driver or if that
>>> value is 0 sets the read mask to 0x80.
>>
>> It only sets it to the bus default if both read_flag_mask and write_flag_mask are 0. The assumption is that both of them being zero is a invalid configuration and either of them (or both) have to be non-zero for proper operation, since otherwise the device can't tell the difference between a read and a write.
>>
>> Do you have a device where both the read and the write mask is 0?
>>
>> - Lars
>
> Yes I do have a device that the read/write mask are both 0.
>
> The device, which is already in production, has a specific control register that sets either the reading or writing of the rest of the registers.
>
> Here is the data sheet
>
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/afe4403.pdf
>
> See page 61 control0.
>
> Driver is written for this part just want to get this lead patch in or maybe an alternate solution.

Looking at this the generic SPI regmap implementation might not necessarily 
be the best thing to use here and you are probably better of implementing 
either your own regmap bus or reg_read/reg_write callbacks that 
automatically set/clear the SPI_READ bit in the control register depending 
on the operation.

- Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ