[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140930213444.GA8259@dtor-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:34:44 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Wu Zhangjin <falcon@...zu.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, hare@...e.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>,
Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
Pierre Fersing <pierre-fersing@...rref.org>,
Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@...gotech.com>,
Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@...gotech.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...gotech.com>,
Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@...gotech.com>,
Cas ey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>,
Hariprasad S <hariprasad@...lsio.com>,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] kthread: warn on kill signal if not OOM
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:34PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> On Mon 2014-09-22 13:23:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Monday, September 22, 2014 09:49:06 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Thu 2014-09-11 13:23:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:59:25PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > > > > Yes, but we mostly do this anyway. SCSI for instance does asynchronous
> > > > > scanning of attached devices (once the cards are probed)
> > > >
> > > > What would it do it card was a bit slow to probe?
> > > >
> > > > > but has a sync
> > > > > point for ordering.
> > > >
> > > > Quite often we do not really care about ordering of devices. I mean,
> > > > does it matter if your mouse is discovered before your keyboard or
> > > > after?
> > >
> > > Actually yes, I suspect it does.
> > >
> > > I do evtest /dev/input/eventX by hand, occassionaly. It would be
> > > annoying if they moved between reboots.
> >
> > I am sorry but you will have to cope with such annoyances. It' snot like we
> > fail to boot the box here.
> >
> > The systems are now mostly hot-pluggable and userland is supposed to
> > handle it, and it does, at least for input devices. If you want stable naming
> > use udev facilities to rename devices as needed or add needed symlinks (by-id,
> > etc.).
>
> Well, it would be nice if udev was not mandatory. Do the sync points
> for ordering actually cost us something?
Yes, boot time. We can save a second or two off the boot time if we probe
several devices/drivers simultaneously.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists