[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140930221440.GW28481@sonymobile.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:14:41 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
CC: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Eric Holmberg <eholmber@...eaurora.org>,
"Cavin, Courtney" <Courtney.Cavin@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW Mutex
block
On Tue 30 Sep 14:48 PDT 2014, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
Thanks for the review, I didn't find the generic binding until after I sent
this out.
> On 09/29/2014 11:35 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.txt
[..]
> > +- qcom,num-locks:
> > + Usage: required
> > + Value type: <u32>
> > + Definition: the number of locks/mutex available in this block
>
> Please use the common hwlock-num-locks property defined in the common
> bindings, instead of a qcom specific property name.
>
I'll update this and send out a new version as soon as the generic binding have
settled.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + hwlock@...84000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
> > + reg = <0xfd484000 0x1000>;
> > + reg-names = "mutex-base";
> > + qcom,num-locks = <32>;
>
> You also need to add the #hwlock-cells = <1>, without which you won't be
> able to parse a client user's lock id.
>
Yeah, I noticed.
[..]
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
[..]
> > +static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
[..]
> > +
> > + ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &qcom_hwspinlock_ops,
> > + BASE_ID, num_locks);
>
> I had also done the registration for OMAP hwspinlock driver using a
> constant id in my v5, but had revised it based on Ohad's review comment,
> so you may have to revise here as well. Please see [1] for details.
>
Okay, I can add that too.
> > + if (ret)
> > + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
[..]
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4096881/
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists