[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FC91F0E6-EED6-4D3B-979C-9787D002C527@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:42:38 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace
Nicely enough we get the context switch benefit without any cost in the comon case of 64-bit apps.
On September 30, 2014 3:27:41 PM PDT, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> It would certainly be possible to clear NT and retry IRET if IRET
>> fails with NT set. This would have no overhead for anything
>relevant.
>> That would be this alternative from my 0/2 email:
>>
>> - Don't filter NT on sysenter. Instead, filter it on EFI entry
>> and modify the IRET code to retry without NT set if NT was set.
>>
>> Thomas hpa, etc: any thoughts?
>
>Filter it right away. That's solid and obvious. Anything else is just
>complex and prone for future brown paperbag failures.
>
>We get the context switch benefit from it, so there is some
>compensation for the extra cycles.
>
>Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists