[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaCcaNmv=fciiVJdmu3M7-dhqjqgAuP6eeJkkfptFbA1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:43:21 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users of gpiochip_remove() retval
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav
<pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com> wrote:
> Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove
> Get rid of the check for return value.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next.
I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot
quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists