[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542BB2B1.9010107@smartplayin.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:22:17 +0530
From: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users of gpiochip_remove()
retval
On Wednesday 01 October 2014 01:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav
> <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com> wrote:
>
>> Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove
>> Get rid of the check for return value.
>>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
>> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
>
> This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next.
>
> I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot
> quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at?
>
Sorry for this Linus. I have applied these patches on linux-next's
3.17-rc6. Just checked the other patch fixing these have come after rc6.
Should have done on master or gpio tree master.
Will be more careful next time.
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists