[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141001083917.GG6884@lukather>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:39:17 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Ténart <antoine@...e-electrons.com>,
lars@...afoo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional
Hi Vinod,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 09:37:57PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Nowadays, some drivers don't have anything in there channel allocation
> > callbacks anymore.
> >
> > Remove the BUG_ON if those callbacks aren't implemented, in order to allow
> > drivers to not implement them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > index d5d30ed863ce..cfcb181b1184 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > @@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
> > BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> > !device->device_prep_interleaved_dma);
> >
> > - BUG_ON(!device->device_alloc_chan_resources);
> > - BUG_ON(!device->device_free_chan_resources);
> Dont think we have drivers without free. IIRC cppi one might be only
> instance
It was more a matter of simmetry to be honest, I'm fine dropping it if
you want.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists