[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542B5DC2.8020806@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:49:54 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
x86@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] enhance DMA CMA on x86
On 09/30/2014 07:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Whether the proposed patchset is the correct solution to support it is
> a completely different question.
This patchset has been in mainline since 3.16 and has already caused
regressions, so the question of whether this is the correct solution has
already been answered.
> So either you stop this right now and help Akinobu to find the proper
> solution
If this is only a test platform for ARM parts then I don't think it
unreasonable to suggest forking x86 swiotlb support into a iommu=cma
selector that gets DMA mapping working for this test platform and doesn't
cause a bunch of breakage.
Which is different than if the plan is to ship production units for x86;
then a general purpose solution will be required.
As to the good design of a general purpose solution for allocating and
mapping huge order pages, you are certainly more qualified to help Akinobu
than I am.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists