[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141001123708.GZ4273@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 13:37:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/i2c:tda998x: Use the HDMI audio CODEC
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > + request_module("snd-soc-hdmi-codec");
> > > + pdev = platform_device_register_resndata(&priv->hdmi->dev,
> > > + "hdmi-audio-codec",
> > > + PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > > + NULL, 0,
> > > + &tda998x_hdmi_data,
> > > + sizeof tda998x_hdmi_data);
> > Why is this request_module() needed? If there is a good reason for it
> > we should have some documentation.
> The reason is simple: as the HDMI CODEC is not declared in the DT, the
> associated module must be loaded in memory.
No, that doesn't make sense - there's absolutely no dependency on DT for
module loading, non-DT boards work perfectly fine. Think about this for
a minute, we don't have lots of request_module() calls in board files.
You're working around some other bug here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists