linux-kernel - 回复： Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1890664630.35241.1412174339749.JavaMail.root@bj-mail03.pku.edu.cn>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:38:59 +0800 (CST)
From:	Xuetao Guan  <gxt@....edu.cn>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 回复： Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP


----- Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> 写道：
> On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 09:49 +0800, Xuetao Guan wrote:
> > Sorry for late reply.
> 
> You replied within four days. That's rather quick, actually.
> 
> > I checked this config, and it's only used for HAS_IOPORT_MAP in lib/Kconfig
> > Sure, removing it means no different for .config file.
> > I think a better way is reserving it
> 
> I'm not sure I get what you're saying here: what do mean with "reserving
> it"?

I mean, it's better to keep the code unchanged.

> 
> > or moving it into arch/Kconfig
> 
> Without a (treewide) patch I find it hard to say whether that's worth
> the trouble. But even if that move would be done, wouldn't it include
> dropping this entry from arch/unicore32 anyway?

IMHO, this config could be removed from kernel code.

> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/