[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141001172855.GL10233@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:28:55 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: qcom: add description of KPSS WDT for IPQ8064
On 10/01, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> @@ -96,6 +104,13 @@
> cpu-offset = <0x80000>;
> };
>
> + watchdog@...a038 {
> + compatible = "qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064";
> + reg = <0x0208a038 0x40>;
Not being aligned to 4k or 1k raises red flags.
The watchdog is part of the timer block (on this chip it's
"qcom,kpss-timer"). We should add qcom,kpss-wdt to the compatible
list in the timer binding and extend that binding to have clocks
and timeout-sec (watchdog-timeout-sec?). This would follow DT
best practices of having one node per device. We could also add
the interrupts too, even if they're not used by the driver right
now.
> + clocks = <&sleep_clk>;
> + timeout-sec = <10>;
> + };
> +
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists