[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141001002459.GA1007@omega>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 02:25:01 +0200
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] ieee802154: add __init to
lowpan_frags_sysctl_register
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:34:08PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> lowpan_frags_sysctl_register is only called by __init lowpan_net_frag_init
> (part of the lowpan module).
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
> ---
> This is untested.
>
> net/ieee802154/reassembly.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c b/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c
> index 32755cb..30ec608 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c
> +++ b/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c
> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void __net_exit lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_unregister(struct net *net)
>
> static struct ctl_table_header *lowpan_ctl_header;
>
> -static int lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void)
> +static int __init lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void)
yes right, but there is more lacks of missing "__init". See below.
> {
> lowpan_ctl_header = register_net_sysctl(&init_net,
> "net/ieee802154/6lowpan",
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void lowpan_frags_sysctl_unregister(void)
> unregister_net_sysctl_table(lowpan_ctl_header);
> }
> #else
> -static inline int lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register(struct net *net)
> +static inline int __init lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register(struct net *net)
This is wrong, it's callback from "struct pernet_operations lowpan_frags_ops".
> {
> return 0;
> }
Your patch adds "__init" now for two different functions and we have
two different declarations for these functions, depends if CONFIG_SYSCTL is
enabled.
Now if CONFIG_SYSCTL select we have as lowpan_frags_sysctl_register declaration:
static int __init lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void)
if not:
static inline int lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void)
Same for lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register and vice versa for CONFIG_SYSCTL.
Your changes are for two different functions (Don't know if you realized that):
"lowpan_frags_sysctl_register" and "lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register",
which makes no sense. Also lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register isn't called
by module init which is wrong.
To make "correct" cleanup for this "__init" should be add to the functions, for
both declarations if CONFIG_SYSCTL is set or not:
- lowpan_net_frag_init
- lowpan_frags_sysctl_register
I see now it's already applied, David please revert this change. Are you
fine to apply a correct version of this to wpan-next tree, next time?
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists