linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] mtd: ubi: Read disturb infrastructure

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:	Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:42:47 +0300
From:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, dedeking1@...il.com
CC:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] mtd: ubi: Read disturb infrastructure

On 10/2/2014 4:24 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 02.10.2014 14:50, schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
>>> Consider the case where you have a board with a fastmap enabled bootloader and a Linux OS.
>>> The bootloader does a fastmap attach and boots the kernel from UBI and the kernel it self has the rootfs
>>> on UBI too. If you install a new kernel with your changes applied it will write the fastmap in a different
>>> format and the bootloader will fail badly. In worst case the board bricks, in best case the bootloader can fall back
>>> to scanning mode but it will be slow and the customer unhappy.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I understand the problem now. I wanted to discuss a possible solution before implementing it:
>> We have a "fastmap version" in fm_sb. At the moment UBI_FM_FMT_VERSION = 1 and any other is not supported. We can use that; Add another fm version (UBI_FM_FMT_VERSION_RD = 2) and
>> then decide according to it. Meaning, if during attach process we find fm superblock we check it's version, if it's != UBI_FM_FMT_VERSION_RD, we fall back to full scan. The next
>> fastmap will be written with the new layout (and new version number) so second boot will attach from fastmap without any issues.
>
> Yes, if we change the fastmap on-disk layout we need to change UBI_FM_FMT_VERSION.
> Then other fastmap implementations will notice the change and can hopefully recover.
> Implementations which do not evaluate UBI_FM_FMT_VERSION deserve breaking. ;-)

good. will work on the fix and upload a new set when ready&tested.

>
> That said, I'll not block a layout change but we have to be sure that it is *really* needed.

In order to support read-disturb, I think its really needed. There is no 
other way to save read counter per PEB but in fastmap.

> I'm currently heavily working on fastmap and my local queue with fastmap fixes keeps growing.
> If I find a horror bug which needs a fastmap layout change I want to change the layout only once,
> not twice.
>

How do you test all of your fastmap fixes? Some of them are not easy to 
reproduce (the pq saving for example). Besides heavy stability testing, 
I was testing my changes manually by a lot of dbg prints in the code and 
analyzing the logs manually. Not the optimal way....

> Thanks,
> //richard
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>

Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives