[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542D5E3B.6000309@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:16:27 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [rfcomm_run] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 79 at kernel/sched/core.c:7156
__might_sleep()
On 10/02/2014 09:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:52:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> If yes, then wakeups from signals don't work either, right?
>>
>> Its a kthread, there should not be any signals.
>
> That said, in the tty patch we do appear to have this problem.
That's what I meant. And the module load patch too.
> Oleg, do we want something like the below on top to make that work
> again?
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -326,8 +326,10 @@ long wait_woken(wait_queue_t *wait, unsi
> * woken_wake_function() such that if we observe WQ_FLAG_WOKEN we must
> * also observe all state before the wakeup.
> */
> - if (!(wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN))
> - timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> + if (!(wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN)) {
> + if (___wait_is_interruptible(mode) && !signal_pending_state(mode, current))
> + timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> + }
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists