[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1412259404-5202-1-git-send-email-lisovy@merica.cz>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:16:44 +0200
From: Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lisovy@...il.com, michal.vokac@...ap.cz, sojkam1@....cvut.cz,
Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...ica.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: nand: omap: Synchronize the access to the ECC engine
The AM335x Technical Reference Manual (spruh73j.pdf) says
"Because the ECC engine includes only one accumulation context,
it can be allocated to only one chip-select at a time ... "
(7.1.3.3.12.3). Since the commit 97a288ba2cfa ("ARM: omap2+:
gpmc-nand: Use dynamic platform_device_alloc()") gpmc-nand
driver supports multiple NAND flash devices connected to
the single controller.
Use global 'struct nand_hw_control' among multiple NAND
instances to synchronize the access to the single ECC Engine.
Tested with custom AM335x board using 2x NAND flash chips.
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...ica.cz>
---
Changes since v2:
* Do not use custom locks. Use global 'struct nand_hw_control'
among multiple NAND instances and it will do the work for us
(Roger Quadros)
Changes since v1:
* Since not all the read/write operations are performed by the
omap_read(write)_page_bch() functions use the locks directly on
those places that configure the ECC engine (take the lock) and
read the result from the ECC engine (release the lock).
This approach should cover read/write operations with all
possible ECC modes. (Roger Quadros)
drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index f0dcdb6..dfae46f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
@@ -144,8 +144,13 @@ static u_char bch8_vector[] = {0xf3, 0xdb, 0x14, 0x16, 0x8b, 0xd2, 0xbe, 0xcc,
0xac, 0x6b, 0xff, 0x99, 0x7b};
static u_char bch4_vector[] = {0x00, 0x6b, 0x31, 0xdd, 0x41, 0xbc, 0x10};
+/* Shared among all NAND instances to synchronize the access to the ECC Engine */
+struct nand_hw_control omap_gpmc_controller = {
+ .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(omap_gpmc_controller.lock),
+ .wq = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(omap_gpmc_controller.wq),
+};
+
struct omap_nand_info {
- struct nand_hw_control controller;
struct omap_nand_platform_data *pdata;
struct mtd_info mtd;
struct nand_chip nand;
@@ -1685,9 +1690,6 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
- spin_lock_init(&info->controller.lock);
- init_waitqueue_head(&info->controller.wq);
-
info->pdev = pdev;
info->gpmc_cs = pdata->cs;
info->reg = pdata->reg;
@@ -1707,7 +1709,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
info->phys_base = res->start;
- nand_chip->controller = &info->controller;
+ nand_chip->controller = &omap_gpmc_controller;
nand_chip->IO_ADDR_W = nand_chip->IO_ADDR_R;
nand_chip->cmd_ctrl = omap_hwcontrol;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists