[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2072038.Vir4futZot@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:55:56 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties
On Thursday 02 October 2014 17:38:09 Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Is this a limitation in the way that the AML syntax and compiler works,
> > or is this a decision you made specifically for the _DSD syntax and that
> > could still be changed if there is an overwhelming interest?
>
> It is only limitation of the _DSD device property UUID specification and
> our implementation. It can be changed if needed.
Ok, I see. I think it would be nice if this could be changed in order
to avoid having to copy the #xxx-cells and xxx-names properties from
DT, by providing a more natural syntax.
I'm not blaming you though if you don't want to go through the pain of
updating the spec though, and I won't complain loudly if you don't.
Maybe someone else has an opinion on the matter.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists