linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] perf: Intel Cache QoS Monitoring support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141002174901.GG14343@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:49:01 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] perf: Intel Cache QoS Monitoring support

On Thu, 02 Oct, at 05:04:54PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Yes, we should just get rid of Kconfig and give everyone
> the same kernel like Windows. Much simpler for everyone, 
> wouldn't it be?
> 
> I'm sure you can easily see the flaws in the argument.

No, not really, since that's not the argument I made.

What you wrote is like saying: I don't like using electronic brakes on
my car so I shouldn't use any electronics, ever.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/