[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwybOYtuOn43idiikVDPfBO7pWb4vLjhcM0dYUxTx7odA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:03:58 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Kirill A Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Do not mark PTEs pte_numa when splitting
huge pages
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> You've also mentioned that while I can tell you if nothing dies, I can't
> really tell you if everything is working well. Is there a reasonable way
> to easily say if NUMA is working properly? Even something that would just
> tell me "your NUMA balancing seems to be sane" would be good.
So not having a NUMA machine (and not really wanting one), I can't
really test things like the migration even *working*.
But the easy/obvious test would be to run the autonuma benchmarks, and
verify that the performance is where it's expected to be and that the
migration actually works.
I think the "main" source site is
https://gitorious.org/autonuma-benchmark
but haven't verified.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists