[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542DA3B7.8090901@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:12:55 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Kirill A Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Do not mark PTEs pte_numa when splitting
huge pages
On 10/02/2014 03:07 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:03:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > You've also mentioned that while I can tell you if nothing dies, I can't
>>> > > really tell you if everything is working well. Is there a reasonable way
>>> > > to easily say if NUMA is working properly? Even something that would just
>>> > > tell me "your NUMA balancing seems to be sane" would be good.
>> >
>> > So not having a NUMA machine (and not really wanting one), I can't
>> > really test things like the migration even *working*.
> I believe Sasha uses fakenuma in his KVM for that.
That's true. You can impose arbitrary configurations on your kernel even without your
hardware telling you to...
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists