[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141002124457.d1478b8aa91265e6ff171ab7@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:44:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.debian@....de>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>,
Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: don't remove inotify watchers from alive inode-s
(v2)
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:45:52 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> > With the patch you'll always have the second case. So without the patch you
> > don't receive some events if the file has at least 2 hardlinks and then
> > gets unlinked. I think the risk that some application relies on *not* getting
> > those events is pretty low (especially since in the common case of file
> > without hardlinks you will get all those events).
> Ping Andrew? Do you still need more info or are you now OK to merge the
> patch?
Resend please, with a completed changelog.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists