linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH linux 2/2] fs/proc: use a hash table for the directory entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:27:03 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	rui.xiang@...wei.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, oleg@...hat.com,
	gorcunov@...nvz.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, tytso@....edu,
	Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@...nd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux 2/2] fs/proc: use a hash table for the
 directory entries

On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:07:37 -0700
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:01:50AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@...nd.com>
> >> >
> >> > The current implementation for the directories in /proc is using a single
> >> > linked list. This is slow when handling directories with large numbers of
> >> > entries (eg netdevice-related entries when lots of tunnels are opened).
> >> >
> >> > This patch enables multiple linked lists. A hash based on the entry name is
> >> > used to select the linked list for one given entry.
> >> >
> >> > The speed creation of netdevices is faster as shorter linked lists must be
> >> > scanned when adding a new netdevice.
> >> 
> >> Is the directory of primary concern /proc/net/dev/snmp6 ?
> >> 
> >> Unless I have configured my networking stack weird by mistake that
> >> is the only directory under /proc/net that grows when we add an
> >> interface.
> >> 
> >> I just want to make certain I am seeing the same things that you are
> >> seeing.
> >> 
> >> I feel silly for overlooking this directory when the rest of the
> >> scalability work was done.
> >
> > Slowdown comes from "duplicate name" check:
> >
> >         for (tmp = dir->subdir; tmp; tmp = tmp->next)
> >                 if (strcmp(tmp->name, dp->name) == 0) {
> >                         WARN(1, "proc_dir_entry '%s/%s' already registered\n",
> >                                 dir->name, dp->name);
> >                         break;
> >                 }
> >
> > Removal can be made O(1) after switching to doubly-linked list.
> 
> Yes.  There is the however unfortunate fact that proc directories exist
> to be used.  If we don't switch to a better data structure than a linked
> list the actual use will then opening of the files under
> /proc/net/dev/snmp6/ will become O(N^2).  Which doesn't help much
> (assuming those files are good for something).
> 
> If those files aren't actually useful we should just make registering
> them a config option.  Deprecate them strongly and let only people who
> need extreme backwards compatibility enable them.

Net-snmp uses them (agent/mibgroup/mibII/kernel_linux.c)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/