[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2368A3FCF9F7214298E53C823B0A48EC0423DFE3@AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:25:34 +0000
From: Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@...rix.com>
To: 'Jens Axboe' <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"jlayton@...chiereds.net" <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] introduce ioctl to completely invalidate page cache
> > - fsync_bdev(bdev);
> > - invalidate_bdev(bdev);
> > + flush_buffer_cache(bdev);
> > + if (BLKFLSBUF2 == cmd)
> > + return invalidate_inode_pages2(
> > + bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping);
> > return 0;
>
> We're currently ignoring the buffer cache sync and invalidation (which is odd),
> but at least being consistent would be good.
>
> Might also need a filemap_write_and_wait() to sync before invalidation.
(I've got zero knowledge in this area, so excuse my ignorance!)
Does filemap_write_and_wait() writes back modified, memory-mapped pages? If so, isn't there a race condition? Or have I got it completely wrong?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists