lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:39:54 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, luto@...capital.net, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86: Speed up ___preempt_schedule*() by using
 THUNK helpers

On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:50:13 -0400
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:

> On 09/24/2014 11:02 AM, tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Commit-ID:  0ad6e3c5199be12c9745da8f8b9e3c9f8066c235
> > Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0ad6e3c5199be12c9745da8f8b9e3c9f8066c235
> > Author:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > AuthorDate: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:41:53 +0200
> > Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:15:38 +0200
> > 
> > x86: Speed up ___preempt_schedule*() by using THUNK helpers
> > 
> > ___preempt_schedule() does SAVE_ALL/RESTORE_ALL but this is
> > suboptimal, we do not need to save/restore the callee-saved
> > register. And we already have arch/x86/lib/thunk_*.S which
> > implements the similar asm wrappers, so it makes sense to
> > redefine ___preempt_schedule() as "THUNK ..." and remove
> > preempt.S altogether.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> > Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140921184153.GA23727@redhat.com
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > ---
> 
> Hi Oleg,
> 
> I *think* that this patch is causing the following trace (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44
> is new code introduced by this patch):
> 
> 
> [  921.908530] kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:2702!
> [  921.909159] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> [  921.910084] Dumping ftrace buffer:
> [  921.910626]    (ftrace buffer empty)
> [  921.911178] Modules linked in:
> [  921.915690] CPU: 18 PID: 9489 Comm: trinity-c195 Not tainted 3.17.0-rc7-next-20141002-sasha-00031-gbdb4244 #1273
> [  921.917016] task: ffff8802bd748000 ti: ffff8802bda3c000 task.ti: ffff8802bda3c000
> [  921.917752] RIP: __schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:2702 kernel/sched/core.c:2808)
> [  921.917752] RSP: 0018:ffff8802bda3c360  EFLAGS: 00010297
> [  921.917752] RAX: ffff8802bda3c000 RBX: ffff8808501e2a00 RCX: 0000000000000001
> [  921.917752] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000286
> [  921.917752] RBP: ffff8802bda3c3c0 R08: 000000000001aa50 R09: 0000000000000000
> [  921.917752] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000012
> [  921.917752] R13: ffff8808501e2a00 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffff8802bda3c428
> [  921.917752] FS:  00007f5475cc2700(0000) GS:ffff880850000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  921.917752] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [  921.917752] CR2: 00007f5475abe60c CR3: 00000002bebab000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
> [  921.917752] DR0: 00000000006f0000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [  921.917752] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
> [  921.917752] Stack:
> [  921.917752]  000000000001aa50 ffff8802bd748000 ffff8802bda3ffd8 00000000001e2a00
> [  921.917752]  00000000001e2a00 ffff8802bd748000 ffff8802bda3c3a0 00000000001e2a00
> [  921.917752]  ffff8802bd748000 000000000001a9ea 0000000000000002 ffff8802bda3c428
> [  921.917752] Call Trace:
> [  921.917752] schedule_user (kernel/sched/core.c:2894 include/linux/jump_label.h:114 include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:27 include/linux/context_tracking.h:20 kernel/sched/core.c:2909)
> [  921.917752] int_careful (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:560)
> [  921.917752] ? retint_careful (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:889)
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:80 (discriminator 1) kernel/sched/core.c:2943 (discriminator 1))
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:75 kernel/context_tracking.c:143)
> [  921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44)
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145)
> [  921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44)
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145)
> [  921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44)
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145)
> [  921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44)
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145)
> [  921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44)
> [  921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145)

<snip lots of repeats of this>

I *think* this is because RBP isn't being saved across task switch
anymore?

Without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS that night not be a problem...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ