[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A9781A2E-F3CA-4E8A-833C-D167B456D9F7@perenite.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:29:21 +0200
From: Benoit Masson <benoitm@...enite.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Benoit Masson <yahoo@...enite.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes
Le 3 oct. 2014 à 17:06, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> a écrit :
> On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote:
>>>> Le 19 sept. 2014 à 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> a écrit :
>>>> this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usual,
>>>> I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-300d
>>>> dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing
>>>> lists instead of each of the DT maintainers.
>>>>
>>>> First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one common
>>>> node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and node
>>>> alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are moved
>>>> to the common node from one board specific node.
>>>>
>>>> Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d which
>>>> is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I also
>>>> found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally,
>>>> there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is set
>>>> for two.
>>>>
>>>> I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is nothing
>>>> important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have
>>>> already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do no
>>>> harm.
>>>>
>>>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in
>>>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit
>>>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch from the
>>> series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'll be
>>> able to test during next week.
>>
>> Did you ever get a chance to test this series?
>
> Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushed the
> patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on
> v3.17-rc1 to
>
> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4
>
Hi tahnks, that was my last question, because I was lost about which to apply from the list of 8.
Also I've noted you did some other patch for Armada XP not related to ix-4-300d, are they included here or should I get them too ?
I'll test those over Sunday night.
Benoit
> Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists