[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6ryws=d_7NXhzWyu34TaV+Yv8y0+D4Q0ewuzDEv=8xDxRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:50:46 +0200
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities
On 3 October 2014 17:27, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
> Yes, I guess a single patch is indeed OK. I have few nit-picks, though.
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 18:13 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> - ubi_err("'ubi_io_read_ec_hdr()' returned unknown code %d", err);
>> + ubi_err(ubi,
>> + "'ubi_io_read_ec_hdr()' returned unknown code %d", err);
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> I think it is fine if the line is long in these cases, let's keep the
> message on the same line, this split does not contribute to better
> readability, quite the opposite, in my opinion.
>
> One line:
> ubi_err(ubi, "long line")
>
> Multiple lines:
> ubi_err(ubi, "long line,
> parameters)
You should discuss that with checkpatch team, because ARAIR it will
complain about "long line" with any other parameter in the same line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists