linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] sched: add utilization_avg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141003160555.GH28662@e103034-lin>
Date:	Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:05:55 +0100
From:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] sched: add utilization_avg_contrib

On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 04:14:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 04:51:01PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 3 October 2014 16:36, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +      * utilization_load_avg is the sum of the average running time of the
> > >> +      * sched_entities on the rq.
> > >>        */
> > >
> > > So I think there was some talk about a blocked_utilization thingy, which
> > > would track the avg running time of the tasks currently asleep, right?
> > >
> > 
> > yes. Do you mean that we should anticipate and rename
> > utilization_load_avg into utilization_runnable_avg to make space for a
> > utilization_blocked_avg that could be added in future ?
> 
> nah, just trying to put things straight in my brain, including what is
> 'missing'.

As Ben pointed out in the scale-invariance thread, we need blocked
utilization. I fully agree with that. It doesn't make any sense not to
include it. In fact I do have the patch already.

If you want to rename utlization_load_avg you should name it
utilization_running_avg, not utilization_runnable_avg :) Or even better,
something shorter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/