[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542EFC36.1010306@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:42:46 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
colin.king@...onical.com, luto@...capital.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] selftests/ipc: change test to use ksft framework
On 10/03/2014 11:39 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 09:36 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> msgque.key = ftok(argv[0], 822155650);
>> if (msgque.key == -1) {
>> - printf("Can't make key\n");
>> - return -errno;
>> + printf("Can't make key: %d\n", -errno);
>
> So printing a numeric value is quite useless when users actually run
> into these errors -- which is why I like err() so much. How about using
> strerror() instead?
>
Yes. using perror() does give better information. There are other
places in this file that use errno. How about I make that a separate
patch and catch all of them at once to use perror() as a follow-up
change? That way I fix all at once without adding more changes to
this patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists