linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 215/238] md/raid1: be more cautious where we read-balance during resync.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  3 Oct 2014 14:32:10 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 215/238] md/raid1:  be more cautious where we read-balance during resync.

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>

commit c6d119cf1b5a778e9ed60a006e2a434fcc4471a2 upstream.

commit 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761 made
it possible for reads to happen concurrently with resync.
This means that we need to be more careful where read_balancing
is allowed during resync - we can no longer be sure that any
resync that has already started will definitely finish.

So keep read_balancing to before recovery_cp, which is conservative
but safe.

This bug makes it possible to read from a device that doesn't
have up-to-date data, so it can cause data corruption.
So it is suitable for any kernel since 3.11.

Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/raid1.c |    6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -540,11 +540,7 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *c
 	has_nonrot_disk = 0;
 	choose_next_idle = 0;

-	if (conf->mddev->recovery_cp < MaxSector &&
-	    (this_sector + sectors >= conf->next_resync))
-		choose_first = 1;
-	else
-		choose_first = 0;
+	choose_first = (conf->mddev->recovery_cp < this_sector + sectors);

 	for (disk = 0 ; disk < conf->raid_disks * 2 ; disk++) {
 		sector_t dist;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/