[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1412317384.5149.19.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:23:04 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched,idle: teach select_idle_sibling about idle
states
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 13:15 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Subject: sched,idle: teach select_idle_sibling about idle states
>
> Change select_idle_sibling to take cpu idle exit latency into
> account. First preference is to select the cpu with the lowest
> exit latency from a completely idle sched_group inside the CPU;
> if that is not available, we pick the CPU with the lowest exit
> latency in any sched_group.
>
> This increases the total search time of select_idle_sibling,
> we may want to look into propagating load info up the sched_group
> tree in some way. That information would also be useful to prevent
> the wake_affine logic from causing a load imbalance between
> sched_groups.
A generic boo hiss aimed in the general direction of all of this let's
go look at every possibility on every wakeup stuff. Less is more.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists