linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 218/238] md/raid1: update next_resync under resync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141003212920.641752483@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri,  3 Oct 2014 14:32:13 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 218/238] md/raid1: update next_resync under resync_lock.

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>

commit c2fd4c94deedb89ac1746c4a53219be499372c06 upstream.

raise_barrier() uses next_resync as part of its calculations, so it
really should be updated first, instead of afterwards.

next_resync is always used under resync_lock so update it under
resync lock to, just before it is used.  That is safest.

This could cause normal IO and resync IO to interact badly so
it suitable for -stable.

Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/raid1.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static void flush_pending_writes(struct
  *    there is no normal IO happeing.  It must arrange to call
  *    lower_barrier when the particular background IO completes.
  */
-static void raise_barrier(struct r1conf *conf)
+static void raise_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
 {
 	spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
 
@@ -837,6 +837,7 @@ static void raise_barrier(struct r1conf
 
 	/* block any new IO from starting */
 	conf->barrier++;
+	conf->next_resync = sector_nr;
 
 	/* For these conditions we must wait:
 	 * A: while the array is in frozen state
@@ -2542,9 +2543,8 @@ static sector_t sync_request(struct mdde
 
 	bitmap_cond_end_sync(mddev->bitmap, sector_nr);
 	r1_bio = mempool_alloc(conf->r1buf_pool, GFP_NOIO);
-	raise_barrier(conf);
 
-	conf->next_resync = sector_nr;
+	raise_barrier(conf, sector_nr);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	/*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/