linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 168/357] nfs: fix nonblocking calls to nfs_page_group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141003212938.526421447@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri,  3 Oct 2014 14:29:14 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Weston Andros Adamson <dros@...marydata.com>,
	Peng Tao <tao.peng@...marydata.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 168/357] nfs: fix nonblocking calls to nfs_page_group_lock

3.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@...marydata.com>

commit bc8a309e88a86205fc3e17f06e42a2e56fc6f807 upstream.

nfs_page_group_lock was calling wait_on_bit_lock even when told not to
block. Fix by first trying test_and_set_bit, followed by wait_on_bit_lock
if and only if blocking is allowed.  Return -EAGAIN if nonblocking and the
test_and_set of the bit was already locked.

Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@...marydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/pagelist.c |   23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
@@ -149,24 +149,29 @@ static int nfs_wait_bit_uninterruptible(
  *
  * this lock must be held if modifying the page group list
  *
- * returns result from wait_on_bit_lock: 0 on success, < 0 on error
+ * return 0 on success, < 0 on error: -EDELAY if nonblocking or the
+ * result from wait_on_bit_lock
+ *
+ * NOTE: calling with nonblock=false should always have set the
+ *       lock bit (see fs/buffer.c and other uses of wait_on_bit_lock
+ *       with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE), so there is no need to check the result.
  */
 int
 nfs_page_group_lock(struct nfs_page *req, bool nonblock)
 {
 	struct nfs_page *head = req->wb_head;
-	int ret;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(head != head->wb_head);
 
-	do {
-		ret = wait_on_bit_lock(&head->wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK,
-			nfs_wait_bit_uninterruptible,
-			TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-	} while (!nonblock && ret != 0);
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_HEADLOCK, &head->wb_flags))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!nonblock)
+		return wait_on_bit_lock(&head->wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK,
+				nfs_wait_bit_uninterruptible,
+				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret > 0);
-	return ret;
+	return -EAGAIN;
 }
 
 /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/