[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141003.145524.270976129977723195.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mwelling@...e.org
Cc: tony@...mide.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:ethernet:davinci_emac.c:Fixes flaw in mac
address handling.
From: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:43:59 -0500
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:03:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:32:05 -0500
>>
>> > The code currently checks the mac_addr variable that is clearly
>> > zero'd out during allocation.
>> >
>> > Further code is added to bring the mac_addr from the partial pdata.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
>>
>> I don't see anyone specifying a MAC address in the partial pdata,
>> so better to just delete that field.
>>
>> Even if people did, I am not so sure that the partial pdata should
>> unconditionally trump an OF provided MAC address.
>
> So should I just leave the code for handling the mac_addr field from the
> partial pdata out or make it such that the mac_addr field is overriden
> if specified from the devicetree?
I'm saying the partial pdata mac_addr is completely unused and should
be removed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists