linux-kernel - Re: Slowdown due to threads bouncing between HT cores

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141004095004.3b84095f@as>
Date:	Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:50:04 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
To:	"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@...foot.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slowdown due to threads bouncing between HT cores

On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 21:44:29 +0200
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@...foot.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I did a chess benchmark of my new machine (2x E5-2650v3, so 20x2.3GHz
> Haswell-EP), and it performed a bit worse than comparable Windows setups.
> It looks like the scheduler somehow doesn't perform as well with
> hyperthreading; HT is on in the BIOS, but I'm only using 20 threads
> (chess scales sublinearly, so using all 40 usually isn't a good idea),
> so really, the threads should just get one core each and that's it.
> It looks like they are bouncing between cores, reducing overall performance
> by ~20% for some reason. (The machine is otherwise generally idle.)
> 

Try playing with /proc/sys/kernel/sched_migration_cost_ns. This sets
the number of nanoseconds the kernel will wait before considering
moving a thread to another CPU. I have mine set to 50000000.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/