lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:00:37 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Cc:	rjw@...ysocki.net, pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com,
	ulf.hansson@...aro.org, khilman@...aro.org,
	geert+renesas@...der.be, tomasz.figa@...il.com, richard@....at,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: power: domain: Use 'pm_cpu_data' instead
 of 'cpu_data' for compiling break

On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 10:19:50PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> 'cpu_data' is too common to be already used by some architectures (e.g.
> um, m32r, and mn10300), so need use 'pm_cpu_data' instead of, or cause
> compiling break. The related error (with allmodconfig under um):
> 
>     CC      drivers/base/platform.o
>   In file included from ./arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:31:0,
>                    from ./arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16,
>                    from ./arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:13,
>                    from include/linux/thread_info.h:54,
>                    from include/asm-generic/current.h:4,
>                    from arch/um/include/generated/asm/current.h:1,
>                    from include/linux/mutex.h:13,
>                    from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
>                    from include/linux/sysfs.h:15,
>                    from include/linux/kobject.h:21,
>                    from include/linux/device.h:17,
>                    from include/linux/platform_device.h:14,
>                    from drivers/base/platform.c:14:
>   ./arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h:107:19: error: expected identifier or '(' before '&' token
>    #define cpu_data (&boot_cpu_data)
>                      ^
>   include/linux/pm_domain.h:74:23: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_data'
>     struct gpd_cpu_data *cpu_data;
>                        ^
> 
> Also need notice about 80 columns boundary.

I don't object to this change at all, but it could be easier to solve
this by fixing up 'cpu_data' to be named something a bit less "generic"?
What does x86 use for this data type?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists