linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/357] 3.16.4-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141005203858.GD2528@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 5 Oct 2014 13:38:58 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/357] 3.16.4-stable review

On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:23:17PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> At Fri,  3 Oct 2014 14:26:26 -0700,
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Note: This is a big stable release.  Mostly my fault for being on the
> > road last week, combined with an unusually large number of patches being
> > tagged for the stable tree.  Anyway, I've caught up with all pending
> > patches before 3.17-rc7, so if you have marked something for the stable
> > tree that I have not applied, or emailed the stable@....o list asking
> > for a patch, that is not here, please let me know.
> > ---------------------------------
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.4 release.
> > There are 357 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Oct  5 21:28:42 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.16.4-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> Al 3.16.4-rc1, 3.14.20-rc1, and 3.10.56-rc1 passed my test.
> 
>  - Test Cases:
>    - Build this kernel.
>    - Boot this kernel.
>    - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
> 
>  - Test Tool:
>    https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
> 
>  - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
>    http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz
> 
>  - Build Environment:
>    - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
>    - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
>    - memory: 8GB
> 
>  - Test Target Environment:
>    - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
>    - # of vCPU: 2
>    - memory: 2GB

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/