linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: use kfree_rcu instead of i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141005034806.GX7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 5 Oct 2014 04:48:06 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	John de la Garza <john@...ev.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: use kfree_rcu instead of i_callback

On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:00:42PM -0400, John de la Garza wrote:
> Since the callback is doing nothing more than calling kfree() we can
> use kfree_rcu() instead of having to use a callback.

Except that this

> -	kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, inode);

isn't kfree()...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/