[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1412588130.4054.49.camel@x220>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:35:30 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] [media] Remove optional dependency on PLAT_S5P
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 11:26 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2014 11:10:26 Paul Bolle wrote:
> > config VIDEO_SAMSUNG_S5P_TV
> > bool "Samsung TV driver for S5P platform"
> > depends on PM_RUNTIME
> > - depends on PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
> > + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
> > default n
> > ---help---
> > Say Y here to enable selecting the TV output devices for
> >
>
> I wonder if it should now allow being built for ARCH_S5PV210.
That was what Tomasz Figa claimed in
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/53C676DB.6070002@samsung.com
> Maybe it was a mistake to remove the PLAT_S5P symbol without changing
> the use here?
At least it was a bit sloppy to remove the symbol without touching this
(and six other) dependencies. But after nearly three months I lost
patience waiting for a fix to be submitted.
My cleanup doesn't really change a thing. And a proper fix, if needed,
is still possible after this has landed.
> Does S5PV210 have this device?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists