[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141006142538.76d2df29@bbrezillon>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:25:38 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/11] ARM: at91/dt: add LCD panel description to
sama5d3xdm.dtsi
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:01:16 +0200
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xdm.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xdm.dtsi
> [...]
> > + bl_reg: backlight_regulator {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "backlight-power-supply";
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + panel_reg: panel_regulator {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "panel-power-supply";
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + backlight: backlight {
> > + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> > + pwms = <&hlcdc_pwm 0 50000 0>;
> > + brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>;
> > + default-brightness-level = <6>;
> > + power-supply = <&bl_reg>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
>
> Why are these all disabled? Patch 11/11 now needs to enable all of them
> explicitly for each board that uses this display module.
Yes, these nodes should be enabled. I just thought we could include the
xdm dtsi and enable what we really need in the board file, but it
doesn't make any sense...
>
> > + panel: panel {
> > + compatible = "foxlink,fl500wvr00-a0t", "simple-panel";
>
> "simple-panel" shouldn't be in this list. There's nothing useful a
> driver can do by matching on it.
Sure, I'll remove the "simple-panel" compatible string.
>
> > + backlight = <&backlight>;
> > + power-supply = <&panel_reg>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + port@0 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + panel_input: endpoint@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + remote-endpoint = <&hlcdc_panel_output>;
> > + };
> > };
>
> There's no support for OF graphs in simple-panel, so this is unused,
> isn't it?
Actually I use it in my atmel_hlcdc_ouput implementation to figure out
the link between a panel and a device connected on the RGB/DPI bus.
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists