[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5432CDF1.5050904@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:14:25 +0300
From: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] module: search the key only by keyid
On 06/10/14 15:44, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, David Howells wrote:
>
>> Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW. But actually why signer is needed to find the key?
>>> Every key has unique fingerprint.
>> The SKID is by no means guaranteed unique, is not mandatory and has no defined
>> algorithm for generating it.
>>
>>> Or you say that different certificates might have the same PK?
>>> What I would consider strange. But anyway, if PK is the same, then
>>> verification succeed.
>> Do note: We *do* need to get away from using SKIDs. We have situations where
>> we have to use a key that doesn't have one.
>>
> David, I need to push to Linus for 3.17 -- please finalize the fix for
> this and send me a pull request.
>
>
>
Hi David,
I tested KEYS fixes and it works well for modules and integrity.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=keys-next-fixes
Thanks!
- Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists