linux-kernel - Kernel developer refuses to commit intel patches because: women's rights / feminism.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALtyatFJom45VoFbCQJcKzciPqm1Mgzb_29rmSccBtEsfzB4Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Oct 2014 20:00:42 +0000
From:	Gregory Smith <gregorysmith1974a@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Kernel developer refuses to commit intel patches because: women's
 rights / feminism.

If they are going to obstruct, then Feminists need to be thrown out of
kernel development, like how they threw anti-feminist men out of
debian and other linux distro development (because they didn't like
them). (If it's good for the gander, ain't it good for the goose? Oh
it don't work THAT way right?! Only one way)

Or Intel should hire someone to take care of this problem (best
solution, would teach a hard lesson.)

"Actions have consequences (or: why I'm not fixing Intel's bugs any
more) by mjg59
Oct. 2nd, 2014 09:20 am" mjg59.dreamwidth.org site

Linux Kernel Developer Refusing to Update Linux Kernel over #GamerGate
Social Justice Warriors have taken over the opensource/freesoftware
community since 2006, ostracized and removed any programmers who
opposed their beliefs, and more or less ran many men out on a rail.

Revenge is needed. Or atleast equality. Or mjg59 should just quit
patch submission gatekeeping and run for the senate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/