[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141006203823.GB14081@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 22:38:23 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Werner Fink <werner@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ewan Milne <emilne@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
Robert Milasan <rmilasan@...e.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2 2/7] module: add extra argument for
parse_params() callback
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 02:55:38PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > This adds an extra argument onto parse_params() to be used
> > as a way to make the unused callback a bit more useful and
> > generic by allowing the caller to pass on a data structure
> > of its choice.
>
> How do you think about to work with more data type definitions for such callback
> functions?
Sorry I don't understand what you mean.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists