lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:54:06 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <>
To:	David Daney <>
Cc:	Rich Felker <>, David Daney <>,
	libc-alpha <>,
	"" <>,
	Linux MIPS Mailing List <>,
	David Daney <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] MIPS: Allow FPU emulator to use non-stack area.

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:48 PM, David Daney <> wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 04:38 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On 10/06/2014 02:58 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:45:29PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> [...]
>>> This is a huge ill-designed mess.
>> Amen.
>> Can the kernel not just emulate the instructions directly?
> In theory it could, but since there can be implementation defined
> instructions, there is no way to achieve full instruction set coverage for
> all possible machines.

Can modern user code just avoid constructs that require this kind of
trampoline hack?  If so, can this be solved the same way that x86
added no-exec stacks?  (I.e. mark all the binaries as supporting
non-executable stacks and letting them crash if they screw it up.)

Knowing very little about MIPS, it sounds like this is the kernel
compensating for a dumb assembler.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists