lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:06:58 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why do we still have 32 bit counters? Interrupt counters overflow
 within 50 days

On Sun, 5 Oct 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> -DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count) __visible = -1;
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, irq_count) __visible = -1;

What's the point of this? irq_count is solely used to figure out
whether interrupts are nested, i.e. whether we need to switch the
stack on x86_64 or not. See the usage sites in arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
 
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
>  	unsigned int		core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it;
>  	unsigned int		depth;		/* nested irq disables */
>  	unsigned int		wake_depth;	/* nested wake enables */
> -	unsigned int		irq_count;	/* For detecting broken IRQs */
> +	u64			irq_count;	/* For detecting broken IRQs */

This is pointless as this count is solely used for the spurious
detector and reset to 0 when irq_count reaches 100000. See
note_interrupt().

> -extern unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu);
> +extern u64 kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu);

Care to fixup the other call sites of this as well? git grep is your friend.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists