[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141007163742.2ab51fd7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:37:42 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the s390 tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/s390/kernel/processor.c between commit dfcc8c377711 ("s390/vtime:
do not reset idle data on CPU hotplug") from the s390 tree and commit
eb7e7d766326 ("s390: Replace __get_cpu_var uses") from the percpu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
index edefead3b43a,f0305b1189aa..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
@@@ -23,7 -23,8 +23,7 @@@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuid, cpu
*/
void cpu_init(void)
{
- struct cpuid *id = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_id);
- struct s390_idle_data *idle = this_cpu_ptr(&s390_idle);
+ struct cpuid *id = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_id);
get_cpu_id(id);
atomic_inc(&init_mm.mm_count);
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists