lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:54:43 +0530
From:	Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com, anton@...hat.com,
	systemtap@...rceware.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, penberg@....fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf/sdt: Delete SDT events from cache


On 10/07/2014 08:47 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:18:41 +0530, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>> This patch adds the support to delete SDT events from the cache.
>> To delete an event corresponding to a file, first the cache is read into
>> the file_hash list. The key is calculated from the file name.
>> And then, the file_list for that file_hash entry is traversed to find out
>> the target file_list entry. Once, it is found, its contents are all freed up.
>>
>> # ./perf sdt-cache --del /usr/lib64/libc-2.16.so
>>
>> 8 events removed for /usr/lib64/libc-2.16.so!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/builtin-sdt-cache.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   tools/perf/util/parse-events.h |    1 +
>>   tools/perf/util/sdt.c          |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sdt-cache.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sdt-cache.c
>> index 5faf8e5..12276da 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sdt-cache.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sdt-cache.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>   /* Session management structure */
>>   static struct {
>>   	bool add;
>> +	bool del;
>>   	bool dump;
>>   	const char *target;
>>   } params;
>> @@ -29,6 +30,15 @@ static int opt_add_sdt_events(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int opt_del_sdt_events(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
>> +			      const char *str, int unset __maybe_unused)
>> +{
>> +	params.del = true;
>> +	params.target = str;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int opt_show_sdt_events(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
>>   			       const char *str, int unset __maybe_unused)
>>   {
>> @@ -45,13 +55,17 @@ int cmd_sdt_cache(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused
>>   		OPT_CALLBACK('a', "add", NULL, "filename",
>>   			     "add SDT events from a file.",
>>   			     opt_add_sdt_events),
>> +		OPT_CALLBACK('d', "del", NULL, "filename",
>> +			     "Remove SDT events corresponding to a file from the"
>> +			     " sdt cache.",
>> +			     opt_del_sdt_events),
>>   		OPT_CALLBACK_NOOPT('s', "dump", NULL, "show SDT events",
>>   				   "Read SDT events from cache and display.",
>>   				   opt_show_sdt_events),
>>   		OPT_END()
>>   	};
>>   	const char * const sdt_cache_usage[] = {
>> -		"perf sdt_cache [--add filename | --dump]",
>> +		"perf sdt_cache [--add filename | --del filename | --dump]",
> I think it'd be better split the usage into two lines:
>
> 		"perf sdt_cache [--add | --del] <filename>"
> 		"perf sdt_cache --dump"

Nice suggestion. Will change that.

>
>>   		NULL
>>   	};
>>   
>> @@ -63,6 +77,10 @@ int cmd_sdt_cache(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused
>>   
>>   	symbol__elf_init();
>>   	if (params.add) {
>> +		if (params.del) {
>> +			pr_err("Error: Don't use --del with --add\n");
>> +			usage_with_options(sdt_cache_usage, sdt_cache_options);
>> +		}
>>   		if (params.dump) {
>>   			pr_err("Error: Don't use --dump with --add\n");
>>   			usage_with_options(sdt_cache_usage, sdt_cache_options);
>> @@ -70,6 +88,14 @@ int cmd_sdt_cache(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused
>>   		ret = add_sdt_events(params.target);
>>   		if (ret < 0)
>>   			pr_err("Cannot add SDT events to cache!\n");
>> +	} else if (params.del) {
>> +		if (params.dump) {
>> +			pr_err("Error: Don't use --dump with --del\n");
>> +			usage_with_options(sdt_cache_usage, sdt_cache_options);
>> +		}
>> +		ret = remove_sdt_events(params.target);
>> +		if (ret < 0)
>> +			pr_err("Cannot remove SDT events from cache!\n");
>>   	} else if (params.dump) {
>>   		if (argc == 0) {
>>   			ret = dump_sdt_events();
> I think we need to a flag for exclusive options so that it can emit
> warnings like this automatically during option parsing.

Ok.

> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
> [...]

-- 
Thanks,
Hemant Kumar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists