| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:19:40 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: remove use of gpiochip_remove() retval On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav >> <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com> wrote: >> >> > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns >> > void. >> > >> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> >> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com> >> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> >> > CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> >> > Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com> >> >> Already fixed in the GPIO tree. > > What does that mean? That it doesn't need fixing here? No. I think you already ACKed the patch fixing it in the GPIO tree... There has been some misunderstanding and duplicate patches fixing already fixed problems are flying around. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists