[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141007130503.GG5042@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:05:03 +0200
From: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: Set ena_gpio_valid in regulator drivers
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > This patch sets the new field ena_gpio_valid for all drivers which set a
> > valid ena_gpio.
>
> > config.ena_gpio = arizona->pdata.ldoena;
> > + config.ena_gpio_valid = true;
>
> This patch just unconditionally sets the flag in all drivers which will
> break any system which relies on the existing behaviour that we ignore
> GPIO 0. We can definitely set this flag in any DT only system if we get
> the GPIO from DT but otherwise doing this defeats the point of having
> the flag in the first place.
Right, I didn't thought about the old platform data which may pass 0
gpios indicating that there is no gpio.
I will rework this patch.
Thanks,
Markus
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists