linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Check for CONFIG_READABLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141007141113.GH30146@pd.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:11:13 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Check for CONFIG_READABLE_ASM when building .s
 targets

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:45:43PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> Such option would be best of course. BTW, do you know about make
> $file.lst to produce an 'annotated disassembly'?

Yep. Although I sometimes find it harder to parse than looking at
.loc-annotated asm and the c-source.

> The toplevel Makefile rule (where your patch adds the asm_target=$@
> variable) is only used for manual invocation. bounds.s and the like are
> handled by Makefile.build directly.

Ah ok, I'll keep that in mind next time. I was seeing the warning being
issued multiple times, thus the once-tracking.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/