[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54340A45.4050005@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:44:05 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
CC: kthota@...dia.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: tegra: Enable root port specific features
On 10/07/2014 03:27 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Enables root port to advertise its ASPM-L1 capability
> resulting in possible link entry to L1 when an ASPM-L1 capable
> device is connected
> Enables per-controller & per-TMS clock clamping by default
> Enabling above features result in more power saving
>
> It also avoids PM message truncation by waiting for DLLP to finish
> before entering into L1 or L2
>
> Also, it adds helper functions to access root port registers
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -1870,8 +1920,10 @@ static int tegra_pcie_enable(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
>
> tegra_pcie_port_enable(port);
>
> - if (tegra_pcie_port_check_link(port))
> + if (tegra_pcie_port_check_link(port)) {
> + tegra_pcie_enable_rp_features(port);
> continue;
> + }
>
> dev_info(pcie->dev, "link %u down, ignoring\n", port->index);
Wouldn't it be better to have the error case inside the if block; most
error-handling is that way. For example:
if (!tegra_pcie_port_check_link(port)) {
dev_info(pcie->dev, "link %u down, ignoring\n", port->index);
tegra_pcie_port_disable(port);
tegra_pcie_port_free(port);
continue;
}
tegra_pcie_enable_rp_features(port);
... any other "good case" code (of which there admittedly is none at
present)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists